Member Sign In
International Coalition for the Responsibility to Protect
PDF Print E-mail
Crisis Alert: Commentators Warn of Renewed Danger of Atrocities in Darfur
In 2003, a brutal campaign by the Sudanese government against Darfuri rebels protesting decades of political and economic marginalization killed over 300,000 people, internally displaced 2.7 million, with another 250,000 seeking refuge abroad. The Sudanese government, enlisting the support of a nomadic militia known as the Janjaweed, inflicted an ethnically-targeted campaign of mass killings, forced displacement, destruction of property, and the use of rape as a weapon of war, leading many in the international community to accuse the Government of Sudan of genocide.
Twelve years later, emerging evidence of new “scorched earth” campaigns in January 2015—following the Government’s “Decisive Summer” campaign to quash all rebellions in Sudan—have led many commentators to warn that a “fresh threat of genocide in Darfur” looms.  According to the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), the uptick in fighting displaced 430,000 in 2014 alone. More recently, the Sudan Social Development Organization announced that the Rapid Support Forces (a reconstituted and more heavily-armed Janjaweed, supported by the Government of Sudan) evacuated or burned 115 villages in January 2015, all while killing and raping civilians and forcing at least 18,000 to flee.
The renewed “specter of atrocities” can be explained by both economic and political calculations. As Phil Orchard notes, the 2011 secession of South Sudan led to Sudan losing 75% of its oil reserves. The Sudanese government may thus be enacting the ruthless campaign in order to consolidate economic power over Darfur, which possesses oil, crops, livestock, and newly-discovered gold. Meanwhile, with the world focused on Syria, Nigeria, and Islamic terrorism, Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir could be taking advantage of the fact that international interest in Darfur has all but dissipated, and wish to decisively defeat the rebels before presidential elections in April 2015.
Bashir’s gamble may be paying off—the International Criminal Court suspended its investigation into war crimes in Darfur, while rumors are circulating that the Security Council may downsize or overhaul the United Nations and African Union Mission in Darfur (UNAMID) when its mandate expires in June 2015. 
Despite the well-publicized failures of UNAMID to report atrocities to the UN—and its unsatisfactory investigation into the alleged mass rape of 200 girls by Sudanese forces in November 2014—many believe that it is critical that the peacekeeping mission stay active in Darfur. As UN Under Secretary-General for peacekeeping Hervé Ladsous stated, “while we have by no means been perfect in this regard, without us many, many more would have been killed, displaced, put in harm’s way.” Aicha Elbasri, UNAMID’s former spokesperson, concurred, predicting that “ethnically targeted onslaught”, mass rapes, displacements, and bombings would increase if the UN doesn’t put Darfur back on top of the policy agenda. Otherwise, as Orchard cautions, “the people of Darfur are likely to be forgotten just when they need the world’s help again.”
To read more about the conflict, read our "Crisis in Darfurpage or our "Q & A: The Responsibility to Protect and Darfur."

Browse Documents by Region:

International Coalition for the Responsibility to Protect
c/o World Federalist Movement - Institute for Global Policy
708 Third Avenue, Suite 1715, New York, NY 10017