The UN and the Responsibility to Protect
In this section, you will find the following topics:
1. RtoP in the 2005 World Summit Outcome Document
2. References to RtoP in Security Council Open Debates on the Protection of Civilians
3. Security Council Resolution on Darfur: 31 August 2006
4. Burma resolutions in the Security Council
5. The Joint Office of the Special Advisers on the Prevention of Genocide and RtoP
6. Secretary-General's report on the Responsibility to Protect
7. General Assembly July 2009 Debate on the Responsibility to Protect
8. UN General Assembly Resolution A/RES/63/308 on the Responsibility to Protect
RtoP in the 2005 World Summit
United Nations General Assembly Member States embraced the Responsibility to Protect in paragraph 138 and 139 of the Outcome Document of the 2005 World Summit. In the historic gathering of world leaders in New York for the High-level Plenary Meeting of the General Assembly (World Summit), heads of state and government reached consensus on the Responsibility to Protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity. See our page on the 2005 World Summit
References to RtoP in Security Council Open Debates on the Protection of Civilians
On 28 April 2006, the Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 1674 on the Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict. Resolution 1674 contains the historic first official Security Council reference to the Responsibility to Protect. On 28 June 2006, the Council held its first open debate on the protection of civilians in armed conflict, which it has since held twice yearly. The purpose of these semi-annual debates is to take stock of developments in the area of protection of civilians, particularly situation-specific information and assess progress in the implementation of commitments made in Res. 1674. Discussions on RtoP have been an important component of these debates, and governments have used the debates to express their support for RtoP. See our page on the Protection of Civilians debates and all references to RtoP
Security Council Resolution on Darfur: 31 August 2006
The government of Sudan has flagrantly disregarded its responsibility to protect the people of Darfur and the alarm bells have been ringing for years for the international community to take on its responsibility to protect Darfuri citizens from mass atrocities and mass violations of human rights. On 31 August 2006, UN Security Council passed Resolution 1706 authorizing the deployment of 17,300 UN peacekeeping troops to Darfur. Although the mandate met resistance by Khartoum which prevented its deployment, the resolution referred to par. 138-139 on RtoP in the 2005 World Summit outcome Document as well as Resolution 1674 on the Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict. On 31 July 2007, the unanimous adoption of UN Security Council Resolution 1769 authorized the deployment of a 26,000-strong joint UN-AU force for Darfur. While it was an important step toward providing much needed protection to mistreated civilians, it did not refer to the Responsibility to Protect or to the Open debate on the Protection of Civilians, a setback from earlier RtoP advances. See our page on RtoP and the crisis in Darfur
Burma resolutions in the Security Council
In September 2006, the UN Security Council had their first meeting on the situation in Burma and, in January 2007, proposed a resolution calling for the cessation of grave violations of human rights, including the campaign of systematic rape and other forms of sexual violence. However, China and Russia both used their veto to block this resolution claiming that the internal affairs of a state did not belong in the Security Council and that the situation did not constitute threats to international peace and security. See our page on the crisis in Burma.
The Joint Office of the Special Advisers on the Prevention of Genocide and RtoP
The post of Special Adviser to the Secretary-General on the Prevention of Genocide was created by Security Council Resolution 1366 in response to the failure of the international community to prevent the genocides in Rwanda and Bosnia & Herzegovina. The first Special Advisor to the Secretary-General on the Prevention of Genocide, Juan Mendez, was appointed by Kofi Annan in April 2004. On 29 May 2007, Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon appointed Dr. Francis Deng as the Special Advisor for the Prevention of Genocide, who was assigned Under-Secretary-General status and received a full-time post in December 2007 (whereas Mendez was an Assistant Secretary-General and employed part-time). The mandate of the SAPG is to collect existing information, particularly from within the UN system, act as an early warning mechanism, and make recommendations to the Security Council through the Secretary General. A post for the Special Adviser with a focus on the Responsibility to Protect was established on 21 February 2008 following the appointment of Dr. Edward Luck. Dr. Luck’s primary role is to develop conceptual clarity and consensus for the evolving norm, while working closely with the Office of the Special Advisor on the Prevention of Genocide. See our page on the Joint Office.
Secretary-Generals report on the Responsibility to Protect
Secretary-General Ban ki-Moon released a report on 12 January 2009 entitled Implementing the Responsibility to Protect , the first comprehensive UN document on the RtoP. The report clarifies how to understand RtoP and outlines measures and actors involved in rendering the norm operational. Based on paragraph 138-139 of the World Summit, the Secretary-General suggested a hree-pillar approach namely 1) the protection responsibilities of the state, 2) international assistance and capacity building, and 3) timely and decisive response to prevent and halt genocide, ethnic cleansing, war crimes and crimes against humanity. The Secretary-General recommended that the General Assembly meet to consider, based on this report, how Member States will take the 2005 World Summit commitment forward. See our summary of the report
General Assembly July 2009 Debate on the Responsibility to Protect
The General Assembly Debate on RtoP started on 23 July 2009 and continued the full two days of 24 July and 28 July 2009. The 92 Member States (and 2 observers) which spoke on RtoP demonstrated strong interest in the norm and made an important show of support for implementing the 2005 commitment to prevent and halt genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and ethnic cleansing. Governments demonstrated that they were conscientiously considering the proposals in the Secretary-General’s report and also raised important issues and recommendations for the General Assembly, the Security Council, the UN departments, regional bodies and governments. Many recognized the important role of civil society in preventing and reacting to these most serious international violations. Click here to view statements and media coverage on the event. View the Coalition's report on the July Debate and the Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect's assessment of the debate .
UN General Assembly Resolution A/RES/63/308 on the Responsibility to Protect
The first resolution on the Responsibility to Protect was adopted by the General Assembly on 14 September 2009. The resolution (A/RES/63/308) was introduced on September 14, 2009 by the delegation of Guatemala and was co-sponsored by 67 Member States. The GA took note of the report of the Secretary-General and of the debate in the General Assembly, and decided to continue its consideration of RtoP. View the summary of statements on the adoption of the resolution.
UN General Assembly Interactive Dialogue on Early Warning, Assessment and the Responsibility to Protect
On 9 August 9 2010 the General Assembly (GA) held an informal interactive dialogue on Early Warning, Assessment and the Responsibility to Protect, in response to July 14 Secretary General Ban ki Moon’s report on the issue. The dialogue took place in follow up to the July 2009 GA debate on the Responsibility to Protect (RtoP), where Member States agreed (resolution A/RES/63/308) to continue consideration of RtoP. A total of 42 Member States, 2 representatives from regional organizations and 2 representatives from civil society spoke at the dialogue. View our summary of the dialogue and permanent missions’ statement.
The Security Council responded swiftly and decisively to the crisis in Libya in which the Gaddafi government responded to political protests with indiscriminate violence, possibly amounting to crimes against humanity. The Council first passed Resolution 1970 on February 26, 2011, which called upon Libya’s “responsibility to protect” by referring the situation to the ICC and imposing initial financial sanctions as well as an arms embargo. Following a range of earlier attempts to implement peaceful measures, such as diplomatic incentives, asset freezes, arms embargo, and ICC referral, the UN Security Council adopted Resolution 1973 on 17 March 2011, approving a no-fly-zone, calling for an immediate cease-fire and tightening sanctions on the Muammar Qaddafi regime in Libya. Language from Resolution 1973 called the enforcement of a no-fly zone and for “all necessary measures to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat or attack…. while excluding a foreign occupation force of any form.” The Resolution condemned the Libyan government for failing to comply with international law and for allowing gross violations of human rights and attacks that may amount to crimes against humanity.
In response to the escalating, post-election violence against the population of Côte d’Ivoire, the UN Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 1975 on 30 March 2011. The Resolution condemned the gross human rights violations committed by supporters of both Gbagbo and President Ouattara stating, “the attacks currently taking place in Côte d’Ivoire against the civilian population could amount to crimes against humanity.” The resolution cited “the primary responsibility of each State to protect civilians,” called for the immediate transfer of power to Ouattara and mandated targeted sanctions against Gbagbo and his close supporters, and reaffirmed the mandate of the United Nations Operation in Côte d’Ivoire (UNOCI) to “use all necessary means to protect life and property." Resolution 1975 mandated targeted sanctions against Gbagbo and his close supporters, while reaffirming the UN mandate in Côte d’Ivoire to protect civilians and the use of all necessary means to protect them, while preventing the use of heavy weapons. In an effort to protect the people of Côte d’Ivoire from further atrocities, a military operation began on 4 April 2011 and Gbagbo’s hold on power ended on 11 April when he was arrested by Ouattara’s forces after days of fighting with UNOCI and the French military.
UN General Assembly Informal Interactive Dialogue on the Role of Regional and Sub-regional Arrangements in Implementing the Responsibility to Protect
The General Assembly (GA) held an informal interactive dialogue on Tuesday, 12 July 2011 on ‘the responsibility to protect and the role of regional and sub-regional organizations’ in response to the 27 June report of the Secretary General on the issue. On the occasion of the third meeting of the GA on RtoP, a total of 43 Member States, 3 representatives from regional organizations and 4 representatives from civil society spoke at the dialogue. View our report on the dialogue and permanent missions’ statements.
|